Andy Marino PhD, one of the highest-respected EMF research scientists today, has been unleashed onto PECO (the Pennsylvania utility). His testimony is a must-read.
  • 753
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    753
    Shares
Would you want to live next to this bank of wireless 'smart' meters?
Would you want to live next to this bank of wireless ‘smart’ meters?

Article Key Points:

  • There is a “reasonable basis” for concern regarding health risks associated with smart meter wireless emissions.
  • It is “unreasonable” to involuntarily and chronically expose consumers to the electromagnetic energy emitted by smart meters.

Over the past three years at the Smart Grid Awareness website I have detailed a number of concerns related to utility smart meters including financial costs, privacy invasions, cyber threats, and the increased risk of fires as compared with analog meters. Another concern relates to health risks associated with wireless emissions.

Based upon my technical review conducted over two years ago, I created a web page that documented support for the assertion that adverse health impacts could be expected due to exposure to wireless emissions from utility smart meters. Refer to “Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation Power Density Levels for Smart Meters, Various Biological Effects, and Exposure Guidelines,” at https://smartgridawareness.org/rf-health-effects/comparison-values/.

Unfortunately, smart meter deployments continue throughout the world and in some locations consumer refusals are not allowed. Such is the case in the state of Pennsylvania where consumers are not permitted by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to retain safer analog meters.

Based upon my review of peer-reviewed literature over the past few years, one of the studies that helped convince me that exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could indeed be harmful included “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Evidence for a Novel Neurological Syndrome.” One of the authors of that study was Andrew A. Marino, Ph.D. [1]

Recently, it is my understanding that Dr. Marino submitted an “expert report” as part of a case before the Pennsylvania PUC. In this proceeding several consumers have alleged that their health is being negatively affected by smart meters installed by PECO Energy Company [2].

The conclusions reached by Dr. Andrew Marino and presented in his expert report are as follows:

“First, [there] is a reasonable basis in established science for the Complainants’ concern regarding risks to human health caused by man-made electromagnetic energy in the environment, including the type of electromagnetic energy emitted by smart meters. These health risks are heightened in the very young, the very old, and in those with preexisting diseases or disorders.

Second, electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a documented neurological condition in which the affected person experiences musculoskeletal, immunological, and/or neurological symptoms that noticeably flare or intensify upon exposure to man-made electromagnetic energy in the environment. About 5-10% of the general public are self-reported to suffer from this disorder.

Third, the Complainants were forced into the almost impossible position of conducting experiment[s] on themselves to prove to PECO’s satisfaction that their claims of a link between their symptoms and electromagnetic energy from smart meters were sufficiently credible as to warrant some remediable action by PECO.

Fourth, there is no justifiable reason for PECO to doubt the reality of the Complainants’ symptoms, to question their intentions in seeking relief, or to not respect and implement the advice they received from their physicians that exposure to smart-meter energy should be avoided.

Fifth, chronic exposure to the electromagnetic energy from smart meters causes risks to human health that go far beyond the capability of the energy to trigger hypersensitivity reactions in sensitive persons. A large literature in experimental biology indicates that man-made electromagnetic energy, including that from smart meters, causes biological effects involving every essentially physiological process that occurs in living organisms. A large literature in nonexperimental biology shows that man-made electromagnetic energy, including that from smart meters, is associated with a plethora of human diseases. People who suffer from pre-existing conditions are particularly vulnerable, and all the Complainants suffer from such conditions.

Sixth, PECO’s claim that the FCC has pronounced smart meter safe is spurious because the FCC has made that statement only with regard to the heating and cooking effects of electromagnetic energy. The Complainants have made no claims that smart meters are like microwave ovens.

Seventh, PECO has claimed that expert committees have pronounced smart meters safe, but PECO has not acknowledged the blatant conflicts-of interests that infect such committees nor the serious limitations on their reports, such as the failure to address much of the relevant literature.

Eighth, PECO proposes to expose human beings to smart-meter electromagnetic energy over their objection under conditions that would not be acceptable to any institution in the United States where human experimentation can lawfully be performed. Consequently, coercing the Complainants to endure the risks and uncertainties of such exposure is unwarranted, unjustified, and would amount to involuntary human experimentation by PECO.

Regarding the exposure guidelines of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Dr. Marino states that:

“According to the FCC, smart meters and cellphones are safe when manufactured according to the presently mandated emission levels. But the FCC defines an emission level as ‘safe’ if it doesn’t result in adverse biological effects caused by heating or cooking of the exposed subject. Nowhere does the FCC say that smart meters are safe with regard to physiological changes [caused] by physical processes other than heating or cooking. That claim is unsupportable and counter-scientific, and has not been made by the FCC.”

To the contrary:

“There is a very large data base of empirical studies in experimental biology that demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt that biological effects can occur at levels of man-made electromagnetic energy actually present in the environment.”

And that:

“Consequently [there is] no rational basis to argue that PECO’s energy [levels for smart meters] is too small to matter.”

Regarding the symptomatology of the Complainants in the PUC proceeding, Dr. Marino states that:

“There is a sound basis in experimental biology that supports their concerns regarding the consequences to their health that have occurred and that may occur due to future chronic exposure to the electromagnetic energy emitted by smart meters. Under the conditions pertinent to the conditions of this case, coercing the Complainants to endure these risks and uncertainties is unwarranted, unjustified, and would amount to involuntary human experimentation by PECO.

Whether the Pennsylvania PUC and PECO Energy will favorably respond to the reasoned arguments of Andrew Marino, Ph.D. is yet unknown, but if history is any lesson, they will likely remain with their heads in the sand (like the FCC) and proclaim that any claims for adverse biological effects from low-level wireless emissions remain “ambiguous” and “unproven.” We will await the conclusion of the proceedings and update this article at a later date.

References

[1] “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Evidence for a Novel Neurological Syndrome.” By McCarty, DE, Marino, A., et.al, International Journal of Neuroscience, December 2011, volume 121, pp 670-676; refer to link at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21793784.

[2] Expert Report of Andrew A. Marino, Ph.D., dated August 8, 2016; a link for this document where some personal patient information has been redacted is available here: http://andrewamarino.com/PDFs/testimony-AAM_Report.pdf

Article reposted with permission. Original article: https://smartgridawareness.org/2016/10/02/health-risks-associated-with-smart-meter-wireless-emissions/

K. T. Weaver

View all posts

9 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • thank you for the above information on the effects of the smart meters on our health. I have my smart meter turned off; and also, have net metering as I have 4 solar panels tied in to the power line to my home; and in to the meter. Therefore, I have to read my own meter; and also, take photos to make sure of the reading; and give to the Fortis company in BC in the Kootenays and Okanagan. In the Kootenays our family farm has had the electric companies wrecking our privacy and land with running their lines over our land; using at least 5 acres; and it is from mountain to mountain; and I am concerned as BC Hydro line is 500 KV’s. Up maybe a 1/4 mile in the air over fields, but on top of ht e mountain only the height of a power pole; of maybe 30 feet high. It is also, maybe 1/4 mile from my home. I can’t afford a meter to read how much power is leaking and getting us exposed to how much. We had to sign a paper stating we would not gas up machines under the lines; and can’t ride our horses under the power lines along them with metal shoes on their hooves.
    Can you please let me know what you think of this? I am so thankful for your expertise and what you have shared; and I will make sure to forward this forward as much needed information for us!

    • WHAT A HORROR – they are trying to install a smart meter on my home now , Duke energy in North Carolina and everywhere else that Duke reigns , they are FORCING US ( unless we pay their usery fee of $150 up front and $11 a month ( for those of us on disability and already too poor to fight them ) , i will continue to fight them and their usery as long as i can . and yes to get electricity TO MY OWN PROPERTY they needed to put ONE pole in and DESTROYED 4 GORGEOUS MATURE TREES to ( ONE POLE & ON MY OWN PROPERTY ) , they didnt give me the option of trimming the trees down and back , they had us sign a RIGHT OF WAY 15 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF THEIR DAM LINES – WE NO LONGER ARE LIVING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . they are power hungry evil companies and i feel for you and the bastardization of your property . there is NO WAY TO STOP THEM . THAT IS THE ESTABLISHMENT GOVERNMENT , IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE AS THE PEOPLE NOW A DAYS ARE SO BRAIN WASHED ( from public schooling) and the drugs they eat & drink in the water they are like robots , they wont fight for ANYTHING , we are the last of the American generation living amongst a world of BRAIN DEAD ZOMBIES . The Web Of Power: Council On Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, and Trilateral Commission http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/06/04/the-web-of-power-council-on-foreign-relations-bilderberg-and-trilateral-commission/

      • Dang. Here in Oregon they are charging a 36/month fine for every meter opted out. Pacific Power and our PUC are lock-step in this deployment as they call it.

  • Never get too close to a smart meter. Close proximity can cause damage to eyes and also will appear as a diagnosed stroke. I see the problem of proprietary software that operates these meters as a hidden danger. People should not have to purchase expensive equipment to measure what comes out of a smart meter. It should be open source and not hidden by proprietary claims. I have an MRI snapshot of a man that claims close proximity damage to his eyes and anomalies that he claims at least proved it to him as the patient. The snapshot I can share and tell the story of his claims. I just do not know any neurologists to share the image with. His account of what happened is intriguing to me and should be shared.

  • Ive got a scary situation… People are dying left and right in a 55 and older, low income mobile home park. They are mostly in the transmission path.

    I want to get a study going here. They need human Guinea Pigs, well here we are. I want to get this tower removed but I just dont have the resources to do anything. I dont even have a car.

    I have written to the owner, SBA Communications, I have the whole story on my Google Plus Collection, Oakley, Ca Cell Tower.
    https://plus.google.com/116469825263275018168
    Remember to start at the first post, at the bottom of the page.

  • great testimony !! wish they would add the effects of the high voltage transients along with their assesments .the rf is bad but the dirty electricity HVT’s are even more deadly and insidious ,and in buildings with older wiring smartmeters generate a life destroying abundance of electrosmog as none of the wiring was meant to be used as communication wire (twisted and shielded)
    the lower income populations are as usual most exposed , all crammed into densely populated apartment complexes with hundreds of these meters transmitting endlessly …nice way “end poverty” …just kill us all off while we pay rent for the privilege

  • Corrine get the hell out of there. I lived under a cell tower for 5 years. 7 years later I’m still trying to dig myself out of the hole health-wise. Do not wait for others, government to do anything about it.