• 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
Birds have “nest and site abandonment, plumage deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, and death”
US Dept. of Interior Attacks FCC’s “Inapplicable” Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Standards
What about the humans? Are thousands of peer-reviewed studies not enough? Who will hold the FCC and other industry fronts accountable?

The Director of the Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance of the United States Department of the Interior sent a letter to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration in the Department of Commerce that addresses the Interior Department’s concern that cell tower radiation has had negative impacts on the health of migratory birds and other wildlife.

The Interior Department accused the Federal government of employing outdated radiation standards set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a Federal agency with no expertise in health.  The standards are no longer applicable because they control only for overheating and do not protect organisms from the adverse effects of exposure to the low-intensity radiation produced by cell phones and cell towers:

“Study results have documented nest and site abandonment, plumage deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, and death (e.g., Balmori 2005, Balmori and Hallberg 2007, and Everaert and Bauwens 2007). Nesting migratory birds and their offspring have apparently been affected by the radiation from cellular phone towers in the 900 and 1800 MHz frequency ranges – 915 MHz is the standard cellular phone frequency used in the United States.

However, the electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today.

The Department  criticized the Federal government’s proposed procedures for placement and operation of communication towers, and called for “independent, third-party peer-reviewed studies” in the U.S. to examine the effects of cell tower radiation on “migratory birds and other trust species.”

“The problem, however, appears to focus on very low levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. For example, in laboratory studies, T. Litovitz (personal communication) and DiCarlo et al. (2002) raised concerns about impacts of low-level, non-thermal electromagnetic radiation from the standard 915 MHz cell phone frequency on domestic chicken embryos – with some lethal results (Manville 2009, 2013a). Radiation at extremely low levels (0.0001 the level emitted by the average digital cellular telephone) caused heart attacks and the deaths of some chicken embryos subjected to hypoxic conditions in the laboratory while controls subjected to hypoxia were unaffected (DiCarlo et al. 2002). “

The full text of the letter, the addendum and citations are available at:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf

EDIT (2 April 2014) —
Al Manville PhD, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, gives a presentation to Congress on radiation impacts on wildlife (2007):

Take Back Your Power

The award-winning documentary Take Back Your Power uncovers the shocking story behind why hundreds of local governments are standing against the multi-billion dollar rollout of ‘smart’ utility meters. What you’ll discover will surprise, unsettle and ultimately empower you. Watch Take Back Your Power 2017 free on YouTube here.

View all posts

2 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Driving near my house in Seattle, I noticed a speed radar gun atop a 20 foot poll monitoring a school zone. Along the boulevard, there was a row of health young maple trees extending for half a mile, all healthy that is except for one tree – the one next to the radar gun was completely dead at the top.